Deviniti
Atlassian-focused consulting with custom AI application development
Founded 2004 | Wrocław, Poland | 201-250 employees
workflow-integrationenterprise-automationtask-automation
What is Deviniti?
Deviniti was founded on December 13, 2004 in Wrocław, Poland by Piotr Jan Dorosz and Jacek Michał Machata, and now has 250+ employees. The company combines Atlassian-focused consulting and marketplace apps with custom software development, cloud/DevOps, and AI application services.
Deviniti works primarily with clients in SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Atlassian marketplace-app pedigree gives it unusually deep workflow-tool integration experience.
Deviniti tech stack and services
AWSAzurePython
| Service area |
|---|
| Workflow Integration |
| Enterprise Automation |
| Task Automation |
Deviniti pricing
Short answer: Deviniti uses a fixed project, dedicated team pricing approach. Minimum engagement starts at $15K.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From $15K | Well-defined scope |
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Staff augmentation | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Deviniti does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Deviniti pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +20+ years of operating history with a clear founding date and leadership | -Atlassian-ecosystem specialization is a narrower fit for buyers outside that toolchain |
| +Deep Atlassian ecosystem expertise supports agent integration into existing workflow tools | -AI application work is a newer addition relative to its two-decade core consulting history |
| +Combines marketplace product development with custom consulting delivery |
Deviniti vs alternatives
How Deviniti compares to the other top AI Agent Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensorway | Senior-only agent specialists, no generalist overhead. | A senior-only delivery model — every engagement is staffed by engineers who work agent systems full-time, with no junior bench standing in the gap. | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| Spiral Scout | Embedding agents into existing production systems. | Certified Temporal Solution Provider with a proprietary agent runtime (Wippy.ai) | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Vstorm | Mid-market/enterprise buyers, boutique team, named references. | Verified enterprise client roster (Mercedes-Benz, Intel) despite a small team size | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Stride Consulting | Regulated industries, compliance-aware agent deployments. | Explicit focus on agentic AI for regulated/compliance-heavy environments | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Tribe AI | Enterprises wanting a curated specialist-engineer network. | Platform-plus-network delivery model sourcing specialists per project rather than a static bench | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Neurons Lab | Enterprises needing AI discovery and strategy first. | Full-lifecycle model starting at use-case identification, not just implementation | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| RTS Labs | Enterprises stuck at pilot stage, need production ROI. | Explicit pilot-to-production focus with named architecture/guardrails methodology | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | Large enterprises, public-company scale and compliance. | Publicly traded (Nasdaq: GDYN) with 4,500+ engineers — unmatched scale and financial transparency in this roster | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| GeekyAnts | Product teams embedding AI-agent features into software builds. | 18+ years of product engineering combined with an active internal AI-agent R&D program (Geekathon) | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Kanerika | Data-heavy enterprises, agents tied into BI pipelines. | Named, production-deployed internal agent suite (Karl, DokGPT, and others) beyond generic client demos | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Enterprises needing large-scale, multi-year agent programs. | 2,400+ engineers with 20+ years of engineering track record predating its agentic AI practice | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Innowise | Large-scale offshore delivery, dedicated AI agent unit. | 3,500+ person full-cycle software firm with a dedicated internal AI Hub, not a small AI-only shop | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Ideas2IT | Engineering-heavy buyers, AI-augmented software delivery. | Proprietary Agentic SDLC Studio applying agents to its own software delivery process, not just client-facing products | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Netguru | Digital product companies, proven internal-agent case study. | Publicly documented internal production agent (Omega) as proof of applied agent-building capability | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Markovate | Startups/mid-market, generative AI bundled with product dev. | Leadership with direct enterprise AI experience (AT&T, IBM) applied to a boutique-scale delivery team | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Azilen Technologies | FinTech, HRTech, manufacturing — vertical AI agent experience. | Explicit vertical focus across FinTech, manufacturing, and HRTech rather than horizontal generalism | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Quytech | Agentic AI plus computer vision or mobile/AR, one... | Broader AI portfolio spanning agentic AI, computer vision, and AR/VR beyond agents alone | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Master of Code Global | Brands wanting conversational AI, named consumer-brand references. | 20+ years of conversational AI specialization with named enterprise consumer brands (T-Mobile, Burberry) | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Matellio | Enterprises, AI agents within software modernization. | US-HQ enterprise software firm with true multi-country delivery (UK, France, Germany) beyond a single offshore hub | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Signity Solutions | Cost-conscious buyers wanting a genuine AI-first practice. | Documented evolution from web development to AI-first agentic delivery, with MLOps as a distinct capability | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| LeewayHertz | Buyers wanting a Hackett Group-backed AI vendor. | Now backed by The Hackett Group's consulting and benchmarking resources following its 2024 acquisition | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Intuz | Buyers wanting proven live production agent deployments. | Reports 100+ enterprise agent deployments already in production across three named framework stacks | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Instinctools | Enterprises wanting a long-tenured European AI staffing partner. | 25 years of continuous engineering delivery under the same founding leadership, spanning Germany and the US | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| EffectiveSoft | Eastern European engineering depth, US corporate umbrella. | 25 years of software delivery history with dedicated Eastern European development centers | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Azumo | Nearshore cost savings with US-based account management. | Primarily referral-driven client base including named enterprise brands (Meta, UnitedHealth) | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Cogniteq | EU buyers wanting a long-tenured Baltic engineering partner. | 20 years of full-cycle software delivery based in the EU (Lithuania), useful for EU data-residency needs | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| DevCom | Buyers wanting one US vendor for strategy through... | Full lifecycle ownership (strategy through production support) under one US-headquartered vendor | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Softermii | Startups wanting US account team, Eastern European R&D. | Dedicated Kyiv R&D center paired with US-based (LA/Vegas) client-facing presence | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Codebridge Technology | Cost-sensitive buyers, Delaware entity, Ukrainian delivery. | US legal incorporation (Delaware) paired with Kyiv-based engineering delivery for contracting simplicity | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Uvik Software | Startups needing one or two senior Python/AI engineers. | Narrow staff-augmentation model of individual senior Python/AI/ML specialists at low minimum spend | 3.4 | Full comparison |
| Riseup Labs | Cost-sensitive buyers wanting ISO-certified rigor, South Asian rates. | ISO 9001 and 27001 certification brings documented process/security rigor at a low-cost delivery base | 3.4 | Full comparison |
Deviniti FAQ
What is Deviniti?
Atlassian-focused consulting with custom AI application development
How much does Deviniti charge?
Deviniti uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing. Minimum engagement starts at $15K. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Deviniti use?
Deviniti works with AWS, Azure, Python. Primary industries served include SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech.
Is Deviniti right for enterprise?
Atlassian-tooling teams wanting agents in that ecosystem. 201-250 team size. Key consideration: Atlassian-ecosystem specialization is a narrower fit for buyers outside that toolchain.
What are the best Deviniti alternatives?
The best alternatives to Deviniti depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Tensorway: a senior-only delivery model — every engagement is staffed by engineers who work agent systems full-time, with no junior bench standing in the gap.
- Spiral Scout: certified temporal solution provider with a proprietary agent runtime (wippy.ai)
- Vstorm: verified enterprise client roster (mercedes-benz, intel) despite a small team size
Compare Deviniti with other AI Agent Development companies
Deviniti vs Tensorway Deviniti vs Spiral Scout Deviniti vs Vstorm Deviniti vs Stride Consulting Deviniti vs Tribe AI Deviniti vs Neurons Lab Deviniti vs RTS Labs Deviniti vs Grid Dynamics Deviniti vs GeekyAnts Deviniti vs Kanerika Deviniti vs N-iX Deviniti vs Innowise Deviniti vs Ideas2IT Deviniti vs Netguru Deviniti vs Markovate Deviniti vs Azilen Technologies Deviniti vs Quytech Deviniti vs Master of Code Global Deviniti vs Matellio Deviniti vs Signity Solutions Deviniti vs LeewayHertz Deviniti vs Intuz Deviniti vs Instinctools Deviniti vs EffectiveSoft Deviniti vs Azumo Deviniti vs Cogniteq Deviniti vs DevCom Deviniti vs Softermii Deviniti vs Codebridge Technology Deviniti vs Uvik Software Deviniti vs Riseup Labs